Welcome to Tempo’s Idea Portal! Your suggestions are valuable to us and help us make our products even better.
Below is a list of ideas for Tempo, so please search, review and vote for those that would help you the most. We encourage you to add an idea if you don’t see it listed. You can stay updated on the work we are doing here at Tempo by contributing to this page.
To learn more and see our Frequently Asked Questions, click here.
the lack of filter brings confusion and make the whole process of logged time export to rely on user habits/good practice to ensure all timesheets are approved prior to the export, this is a major risk of process non-conformity.
We are really in high need of this information in a report.
This idea has the status "Planned", is there any anticipation on when this feature would be implemented?
This same question has been raised in September 2020, as we are currently in January 2022, are you able to give some prediction to all the voters of this idea?
This is our #1 issue at the moment. We have 10K users and 700+ teams. We need to be able to run a report (ideally filtered by Program, but at a baseline with the Program association included) that shows which team leads haven't approved and for which periods. It's not feasible for us to check the approval tabs on all those teams every week. Cheers!
I don't know how that wasn't considered a mandatory feature. Why do I need to look in multiple spots and then curate the export in order to get what was actually approved?
I see that this is also Planned, but that doesn't really give me any understanding on when it is planned for.
This is a mandatory function in order to integrate timesheets with a financial system otherwise the point of an approver function is significantly degraded.
'Glad' to see so many people facing these issues as well. Would be great if Tempo can facilitate us in this need for more options on 'approval' status reporting
Ingi Brown
Hello, I am excited to share that Timesheet cloud users can now export approval status of the worklogs using our improved raw data export feature in Logged time report. You can learn more here. https://help.tempo.io/cloud/en/tempo-timesheets/generating-reports/exporting-reports.html
Please add this functionalty very soon. Our auditors are pushing hard on this.
the lack of filter brings confusion and make the whole process of logged time export to rely on user habits/good practice to ensure all timesheets are approved prior to the export, this is a major risk of process non-conformity.
We are in dire need of this now and have been waiting for a considerable time.
Hi,
We are really in high need of this information in a report.
This idea has the status "Planned", is there any anticipation on when this feature would be implemented?
This same question has been raised in September 2020, as we are currently in January 2022, are you able to give some prediction to all the voters of this idea?
Kind rergards,
This is our #1 issue at the moment. We have 10K users and 700+ teams. We need to be able to run a report (ideally filtered by Program, but at a baseline with the Program association included) that shows which team leads haven't approved and for which periods. It's not feasible for us to check the approval tabs on all those teams every week. Cheers!
I don't know how that wasn't considered a mandatory feature. Why do I need to look in multiple spots and then curate the export in order to get what was actually approved?
I see that this is also Planned, but that doesn't really give me any understanding on when it is planned for.
This is a mandatory function in order to integrate timesheets with a financial system otherwise the point of an approver function is significantly degraded.
This would be good not just in the export but also in the visible report.
We have a need to produce a report of approved timesheets per month in PDF not Excel format so that would be a good inclusion in this requirement
'Glad' to see so many people facing these issues as well. Would be great if Tempo can facilitate us in this need for more options on 'approval' status reporting
This would be very helpful!